[pp.int.general] Why Members left

[Andrew Norton]

Max Moritz Sievers wrote:
> aloa5 wrote:
>> Max Moritz Sievers schrieb:
>>> aloa5 wrote:
>> AND someone wich has the "extremistic" point of view of the PP´s will
>> say "yes" to the PP... and it does not matter what they say about
>> communism.
> 
> No, it's very important if the PP wants communism or not.
> 
>>>> And this ist the point you did not thought over (enough). This persons
>>>> will *also* not be very happy about a "maybe". Because *no* answer can
>>>> be a "really yes" or a "really no" to nuclear power or to anarchism or
>>>> to communism.
>>> Of course it can.
>> Then it is easy for you to explain this logical in your terms. :)
> 
> Take me as an example. I am totally against nuclear power and communism and 
> totally for anarchy.

Don't understand why. Nothing wrong with nuclear power. It's as clean as 
we have, and as safe. *disclaimer* worked at a nuclear reprocessing 
plant a few years back, developing safety telepresence systems. I worked 
on some of the safety interlock systems on the stuff they used to find 
the leak at Sellafield a few years back for instance.

There are also some interesting waste methods that have been researched 
over the past 15 years, including one thats almost like alchemy - uses a 
proton beam to make the waste more stable. You probably didn't know 
about that, but took a position on a topic without knowing all the facts 
about it. Thats BAD practice.

Andrew