[pp.int.general] About which german amendments have to be annulled
Jens Seipenbusch
seipenbusch at web.de
Fri Nov 14 18:06:12 CET 2008
Hi Felix,
Félix Robles schrieb:
> Wow, that's way too late. I must agree with Carlos that those amendments you
> are proposing are so out of the deadline that it's crystal clear they should
> not be accepted.
i'd agree with you, but
>>
>> 1) keep up the 3rd one pls (the proposal of Richard M. Stallman) which
>> makes the merging into 7th amendment valid again.
i didnt anull this proposal, but Carlos did on 7th november as you see here:
http://int.piratenpartei.de/index.php?title=Pirate_Manifesto_Amendments_Central&diff=prev&oldid=2136
The result now is, that the proposal of RMS was dropped ...nice work.
>>
>> 2) drop the 8th amendment (as already said) which makes the merging to
>> 9th amendment unnecessary.
>>
this one is invalid from the beginning and i have said so repetedly
before both deadlines
>> Additionally i have made two small corrections to the original text of
>> the Tenth amendment, where the deleting of parts of a sentence would
>> leave the sentence incomplete even gramatically. I noted this in the
>> 'arguments' section respectively.
forgive me, but i still think that grammatic and orthographic
corrections should be possible, regardless of a lengthy amendment process.
---
But dont fear, i will accept all this and we'll see what comes out of it.
regards,
Jens
More information about the pp.international.general
mailing list