[pp.int.general] copyright vs. "droit d'auteur"
Carlos Ayala Vargas
aiarakoa at yahoo.es
Fri Jan 9 15:49:39 CET 2009
Richard M Stallman wrote:
> Increased surveillance does not improve overall safety.
>
Agreed.
> It improves safety from attacks by underground groups, but it increases the danger that the government will attack people's rights (for instance, by calling protestors "terrorists", or arresting people for what they read).
Agreed again: the risk -think of Sarkozy's ... what is its name,
EVIDGE?- is clear and present.
> In any case, we must distinguish between safety and human rights. Each is desirable in its own way, but they are not the same. Confusing them is a fallacy at the root of a lot of right-wing authoritarian arguments.
If it were only supported by /right-wing/ parties ... however, data
retention and such was vastly supported by both PSOE and PP -and
actually I don't remember whether there was any Spanish party rejecting
it-; what happened in Europarliament:
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2006:286E:0248:0249:ES:PDF
/Socialists/ and /populars/ joined to get the 2006/24/EC directive
passed; do I have to guess that not only EPP-ED would be the
/right-wing/, but also the /Socialist/ group? I think we have few
possible options here:
- all parties are /right-wing/ parties -there are people in Spain with
that opinion; one only has to visit meneame.net, barrapunto.com and such
webs to check it-
- not all parties are /right-wing/ parties (and in this case, the
confusion you talk about is not only due to /right-wing/ parties;
actually, I disagree with those tags as I believe that parties which use
them usually don't observe the ideological premises they imply)
Unless I forget any other option, those would be, and I choose the
second as the valid one. Regards,
Carlos Ayala
( Aiarakoa )
Partido Pirata National Board's Chairman
More information about the pp.international.general
mailing list