[pp.int.general] purpose of manifesto

[Reinier Bakels]

>    > As I mentioned before, it may be possible to change what the
>    > constition implies about this kind of case, by adding new articles
>    > whose effect would be to prevent article 14 from applying to this
>    > issue.
>
>    As I mentioned before, it is the substance rather than the for that 
> decides
>    whether the constitutional provision would apply. And it would *of 
> course!*
>    be inconsistent if ordinary statutes could decide whether 
> constitutional
>    rules apply!
>
> Please reread what I wrote above.
I am confused. Unless you change the constitution (which is possible in 
somne countries) I don't think you can escape from the protection of 
property, or the right is pretty useless.
reinier