[pp.int.general] cultural flatrate: PP position?
Reinier Bakels
r.bakels at planet.nl
Mon Jun 8 08:13:05 CEST 2009
>> Just a question: Have you been elected? When do you know? What are the
>> predictions?
>
> Nope. We might get one percent of the votes - wich is a pretty good
> result for a party, that gets nearly no media attention.
>
> Christian
> ____________________________________________________
I was very suprised by this message, and actually disdappoited, but now I
understand that you are a different Christian than the Christian that has
been elected in the EP. Now I also understand your opinion on flatrates -
which seems hardly a PP position, but a capitulation to the pressure of
record companies, and an encouragement for rights owners to pursue other
"rent seeking" strategies. Flatrates basically accept the (imho) totally
outdated copyright system and try to organise the administration.
Apparently, flatrates simplify the collection - but there is virtually no
way to establish a just tariff. Redistributing the collected money is a
nightmare. It is utterly expensive (high "transaction cost"). In NL, the
redistribution of levy (Leervergüung) money became a nightmare and is now
under close parliament scrutiny. At some point in time it was even decided
to give money back to the producers of blank CDs etc. - but they are not
very well organised, actually an association of manufacturers had broken up.
reinier
More information about the pp.international.general
mailing list