[pp.int.general] Non-commercial use

[Rick Falkvinge (Piratpartiet)]

Mikko Särelä wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I have been thinking about how the clause to always allow non-commercial 
> use should be defined. The line is blurred if the definition is based on 
> "not making money out of it" as there are so many different ways that one 
> can get monetary compensation even if one does not sell the product. 
>
> Any ideas on how it should be delimited? 
>   
It is actually quite easy, as this is already defined in all national
legislations that I know of. "For purposes of profit" or similar is
refered to everywhere in Swedish code, at least. We don't have to deal
with that problem; we just refer to existing definitions.

"Not making money" is not enough, as you can make money and still be a
not-for-profit organization.