[pp.int.general] Artificial Scarcity

[coretx]

Well, in that case consider that;

A: We can't simply remove government granted monopolies over night.  
( And it would be stupid not to solve some undesired consequences )
B: This would be a entirely new discussion, that has been spoken about  
just to many times.

On your link,
This link might be a nice reply for you : http://libertariannation.org/a/f31l1.html

On Nov 6, 2009, at 9:52 PM, Edison Carter wrote:

> On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 9:16 AM, coretx <coretx at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> PP might be smart when they talk about how to eliminate deadweight  
>> loss,
>> instead of eliminating "artificial scarcity"
>> Artificial scarcity is not the issue, the consequence can be.
>> And gues what, deadweight loss is one of the worst nightmares of free
>> market liberalists, right wing and  left wing extremists etc.
>> Restoring the free market equilibrium is good for both consumers/ 
>> citizens
>> _and_ for business.
>> If explained the right way, no sane person could argue against us.
>>
>
> True liberalists would advocate the complete removal of government- 
> granted
> monopolies (which is what copyrights and patents are)
>
> http://mises.org/story/3682
> ____________________________________________________
> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general