[pp.int.general] Brazilian Pirates in 2010 elections
Andrew Norton
ktetch at gmail.com
Thu Oct 1 18:23:39 CEST 2009
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Rodrigo Pereira <rodripe at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> 2009/10/1 Andrew Norton <ktetch at gmail.com>
>>
>> If there is no conflict between party positions, thats a good start.
>> If the greens let you focus on the pirate party issues, rather than
>> theirs, even better. Finally, do you have a candidate that can support
>> both your policies and theirs?
>
>
> In our forum has raised the question of coalitions. Perhaps the greens will
> be allied with the liberal conservative PSDB to compete with the social
> democrats of the PT in a possible second round in presidential election. In
> Sao Paulo, the greens are combined with the liberal PSDB in the the state
> government that implemented various conflict policies like teaching
> anti-piracy's theology in schools and replacement of free software on public
> computers to micro$oft software.
>
> And another question is that the candidates in other parties do not
> necessarily follow our principles, there would be no control by us. But the
> greens probably would use its control in our candidates.
The degree of control is something that would have to be hammered out
between you when negotiating the deal. Stick to your guns, is all I
can say.
>
>>
>> If these three points are met, it could be a good thing. As well as
>> issue exposure, and practical experience, there's one other thing
>> thats very important in elections demonstrated by this, and that is
>> the ability to work and cooperate with other parties.
>>
>> The USPP was given a similar offer a year ago for the 08 election,
>> with the Connecticut state Constitution party. They offered us ballot
>> spots they couldn't fill, at no cost. however, it was only 24 hours to
>> the filing deadline, and we didn't have anyone in that state that
>> could run. It was considered because of the lack of conflict between
>> their core principles, and ours.
>>
>> Andrew
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Rodrigo Pereira <rodripe at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > Here in Brazil, we heavy discussing the possibility of some pirates
>> > participate in 2010 elections through other political parties. Because
>> > of
>> > the intense bureaucracy, we will probably obtain a registration to
>> > participate in elections only in 2014.
>> >
>> > The Green Party in Sao Paulo offered posts in his party for some pirates
>> > disputing the next elections. This is an advantage for the Green Party
>> > because it increases the number of votes from young people. But the
>> > Green's
>> > program do not cover the Pirate's program and the Pirate's program do
>> > not
>> > cover the Green's program.
>> >
>> > Some pirates have advocated that this would be a way to gain experience,
>> > but
>> > some pirates not advocate this saying that this is not an ethical way to
>> > participate in elections and the greens are "selling posts".
>> >
>> >
>> > I would like to know yours opinion about this question.
>> >
>> > Thank you.
>> >
>> > Rodrix.
>> > Brazilian Pirate Party
>> >
>> > Partido Pirata - http://www.partidopirata.org
>> >
>> > ____________________________________________________
>> > Pirate Parties International - General Talk
>> > pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
>> > http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
>> >
>> >
>> ____________________________________________________
>> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
>> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
>> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
>
>
> ____________________________________________________
> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
>
>
More information about the pp.international.general
mailing list