[pp.int.general] Greens saying Pirate Parties unnecessary

[Mikko Särelä]

If you need to group them all together, then please use the M word instead 
of the P word. That is immaterial monopoly, not property.

-Mikko

On Wed, 16 Sep 2009, Eric Priezkalns wrote:
> Is there an alternative term for the class of things which all get treated as
> property, but which lack physical substance?  As we're interested in reforming
> laws relating to that class of things, it would be helpful if there was a
> recognized shorthand for referring to them.
> 
> E
> 
> On 16 Sep 2009, at 16:17, Richard Stallman wrote:
> 
> >   2) The Pirate Party prioritizes IP reform and protecting privacy.
> > 
> > Please don't call the topic "IP".  It is vital to teach people not
> > to think of copyrights and patents and trademarks and trade secrets
> > as one single issue.  (See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/not-ipr.html.)
> > 
> > ____________________________________________________
> > Pirate Parties International - General Talk
> > pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> > http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
> 
> ____________________________________________________
> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general

-- 
Mikko Särelä
"It is through exchange that difference becomes a blessing, not a
curse", Jonathan Sacks, Chief Rabbi of Great Britain