[pp.int.general] New ideas for PPI and its Member-parties.

[Rodrigo dA]

Sure you can do both but it usually kills your response time if you need to get approval from your peers.
Maybe you could have a community generating projects and something more formal for selecting which 
ones each party is going to support and later on something similar for the ppi.

Andrew: you can agree or not with what they decided to do but they were pretty dynamic and adapted 
pretty quickly when the ddos stopped working.

-rodrigo

Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 03:07:58 +0100
From: teirdes at gmail.com
To: pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
Subject: Re: [pp.int.general] New ideas for PPI and its Member-parties.



  


    
  
  
    On 12/28/2010 01:59 AM, Rodrigo dA wrote:
    
      
      i think decentralization and autonomy is the way of the pirates :P

      look at anon they managed to get lots of people coordinated just
      by giving

      those who are interested the tools they need.

      

      

    
    

    being nameless and many is certainly one way of getting some things
    done, but being public and affiliated with a name, face and
    organisation is another way of getting different things done.

    

    just like with any other thing, there's not "one way" of "doing it"
    and i think if you're running a political party you might have to
    face the consequences of that being that of working slightly
    differently from autonomous activist networks. thereby not saying
    you can't do both at the same time.

    

    /a

    

  


____________________________________________________
Pirate Parties International - General Talk
pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pirateweb.net/pipermail/pp.international.general/attachments/20101228/57da5509/attachment.htm>