[pp.int.general] court of arbitration

[Maxime Rouquet]

On 03/22/2011 07:27 PM, Andrew Norton wrote:
> Maxine, when did you stop being in favour of fair, open, well announced
> elections conducted in the open?
(Fun fact : I had arguments with the previous board in France precisely
because I considered they did not announce well the elections...)

> The statutes (and amendments) can be interprited two ways. One way was
> that further elections would be held, with proper notice. The other was
> that they'd be done as quickly as possible without public notice, and
> only for the benefit of those locally (because clearly you've not heard
> about the MASSIVE complaints about remote participation, AGAIN.)
Can we see more about these complaints you talk about ? I think such a
problem is not about the Court of Arbitration but the whole PPI
conference. I am only speaking about the Court of Arbitration here, I do
not know about this problem.

> You've chosen to support the second. Why?
I did not chose. I am pretty sure your first option is not possible :
the Court of Arbitration had to be elected "like the Board". And that is
what the General Assembly did, as much as possible (and this despite you
*and me* disliking how things went).