[pp.int.general] court of arbitration

[Kenneth Peiruza]

I want Maxime to resign right now.


On 23/03/11 12:01, Brendan Molloy wrote:
> All I could think while reading this is that you've proven the illegitimacy
> of the court of arbitration as you Maxime,  one of the court's 'elected'
> members, is unwilling to listen to, or dare I say, arbitrate, the issues
> facing some members of PPI. It's disgusting.
> 
> For reasons such as the statements you have just made prove to me you are
> insuitable for a position on the court of arbitration, because even in such
> a situation as this, you are incapable  of facing the issues facing remote
> delegates, and taking the weakest stance possible and pushing to further
> limit their access.
> 
> The remote delegates put forward several proposals to the board that will
> require minor modifications to the running of the assembly without direly
> affecting the way it runs, and possibly improving the format for the benefit
> of everybody.
> 
> If anything, there should be a proposal for an amendment enshrining the
> equality of remote delegates with physical delegates. You people need to get
> out of this "us and them" mindset. Europe is part of the World, and so are
> we. What happens when the assembly is hosted in Australia, New Zealand or
> North America?
> 
> Perhaps then Europe will wish they had taken greater notice of current
> technology they could use to improve the situation for remote delegates, to
> allow everyone to have an equal opportunity to have their voice heard and
> actually take part.
> 
> I'm glad that fees weren't made mandatory, because right now, there is
> absolutely no way I could justify paying them when members of PPI would be
> happy to censure other members at their whim.
> 
> Disgraceful.
> 
> 
> 
> 2011/3/23 Maxime Rouquet <maxime.rouquet at partipirate.org>
> 
>> On 03/23/2011 09:58 AM, Kenneth Peiruza wrote:
>>> We are quite used to have every kind of problems with remote delegates.
>>> this is the second time and nothing improved at all, it even went worst.
>>
>> I do not know what will happen about the actual Court of Arbitration
>> but, next time, I am starting to think about submitting an amendment to
>> the PPI statutes that says only people present shall vote at the General
>> Assembly.
>>
>> If you want to vote, either you will come in person, or you will give
>> your vote power to a delegate ; and only you will be responsible for
>> contacting him/her. (This is actually what some parties did.)
>>
>> I warn you because, if such measure is adopted on the status amendment
>> phase, it will work for the Board and Court of Arbitration elections ;
>> so in case such an amendment is adopted, you better have a delegate
>> present.
>> ____________________________________________________
>> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
>> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
>> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
>>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ____________________________________________________
> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general