[pp.int.general] Pirate Party Situation in Spain

[HerNenya]

Hi  pirates,

Answering to messages where we were mentioned, we would like reply as
follows:

------------------------------------------

Justus Römeth @ 16:04 CET

We think it is much better to work as independent pirate party since the
political configuration of spaniard territories. There are specific laws
to each autonomic territory in different competences. That is the reason
we believe it is better to work in our own territory and being
coordinated in a spanish confederation.

We do not know exactly what you mean regarding to join PP-ES. If you
said it in the way that PP-GAL dissapear as a pirate party, PP-GAL has a
present and future projection and a lot of work in our territory.

--------------------------------------------------

Kenneth Peiruza @ 16:31 CET

We can confirm we do want to join under an umbrella organization too, so
it is written in our statutes.

-----------------------------------------------------

Eduardo Perdices @ 20:57 CET

Regarding "Pirate parties in Spain" we agree there is a great trouble
with the blockage in the statutes to take decisions with 90% quorum,
both we are surprised because we lack to know when has been changed and
where are the meeting minutes in reference to this agreements. In fact,
we have looked for the official statues in PP-ES web site and they keep
90% of quorum at this date.

Regarding the last paragraph, we are still waiting to PP-ES join the
mailing list "pirata-34". It was created last week to talk about
confederation matters.

--------------------------------------------------

Maxime Rouquet @ 23:12 CET

We think Maxime's proposal should be studied seriously since the current
internal situation of PP-ES.

--------------------------------------

Nuno Cardoso  @ 3:18 CET

Thank you very much for your contribution methodically written and
argued. We agree with your thoughts.

-----------------------------------------

In our humble oppinion since we are 2 months old, we consider that
having the right of vote in PPI should be based on other criteria which
wouldn't be the borders of countries. For example, although we couldn't
almost have to right to vote, it seems fairer a system which takes into
account the number of member.

Respecting other messages with personal attacks, obviously we are not
getting involved. Therefore we consider messages written in the name of
parties shoud be sent officialy or by their representatives.

Best Regards,

Public Relations Team of PP-GAL
http://www.piratasdegalicia.org


El 04/03/12 16:04, Justus Römeth escribió:
> Moin/hola/ahoi
>
> Instead of bringing up this topic in a number of threads, I think it
> should be discussed on its own. Now, please don't make any personal
> attacks. Instead, it would be nice if Pirates from Spain that know the
> situation would fill the rest of us in about what they think is being
> done wrongly at PPES, how they see PP-CAT's and PP-GAL's positions
> towards this, if they would be okay with forming an umbrella
> organization that represents the various Spanish PPs towards PPI (and
> possibly PPEU) or not, and stuff like that.
>
> I would in particular be interested in knowing whether members of
> PP-CAT and PP-GAL would be interested in joining PPES as well if PPES
> gets their problems under control (as long as Catalonia and Galicia
> are not independent, anyways).
>
> -J
>
>
> ____________________________________________________
> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general


-- 
Isabel Fdez 
GPG EA63DF8E

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pirateweb.net/pipermail/pp.international.general/attachments/20120305/83caefc6/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 554 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.pirateweb.net/pipermail/pp.international.general/attachments/20120305/83caefc6/attachment.pgp>