[pp.int.general] Board meeting protocols of Pirate Parties

[Anouk Neeteson]

great news Kenneth, only I still do not understand the relation between the
given law and not publishing the minutes. Privacy matters are irrelevant to
this law. What I say is that the use of this argument is invalid. And
therefor I ask again what is the reason not to publish the minutes right
now? Please understand me, this is not an attack, but since the Catalonian
pirates are the only pirates not publishing these minutes and in my trying
to understand international relations I still have my formal question open.
I understand the need of editing of the past minutes, but what is the
procedure for the next meeting or otherwise put, can we see it on the our
list then? (since there is no legal reason for this)
Anouk
On Oct 7, 2012 12:14 p.m., "Kenneth Peiruza" <kenneth at pirata.cat> wrote:

> That is exactly.what we said we approved in my email xD
>
>
> Salut!
> Anouk Neeteson <jakobsheep at gmail.com> escribió:
> Hi Kenneth, thanks for the quick reply. Ans as always, an answer gives
> another question. The sanctions mentioned in Artículo 45 are only for
> those that enforce 'confession', it does NOT state:" It's is strictly
> forbidden to reveal the ideology of a person." But it would be like:
> "It is strictly forbidden to enforce to have someone reveal his/her
> ideologie." So I don not understand the argumentation NOT to share the
> general assembly's minutes because of the LOPD.
> In the Netherlands if someone does not want to have their name
> published, they got a pseudonym for that purpose. Why don't you do it
> the same way in Catalonia? Especially since it is so essential for the
> transparency as you claim to support.
>
> Anouk Neeteson
> member international coordination Belgium and the Netherlands.
> (proposing an international coordination team in France next AG in
> Montreuil)
>
>
> On 7 October 2012 09:23, Dario <dario at pirata.cat> wrote:
> > 2012/10/7 Anouk Neeteson <jakobsheep at gmail.com>
> >>
> >> Hi Kenneth, can you give me the precise text in the Spanish LOPD ? I
> >> am very curious how it states / defines:  " It's is strictly forbidden
> >> to reveal the ideology of a person." ? And I can not find it, but
> >> again my Spanish is really bad :)
> >
> >
> > http://noticias.juridicas.com/base_datos/Admin/lo15-1999.t2.html#a7
> >
> >> Artículo 7. Datos especialmente protegidos.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 1. De acuerdo con lo establecido en el apartado 2 del artículo 16 de la
> >> Constitución, nadie podrá ser obligado a declarar sobre su ideología,
> >> religión o creencias.
> >
> >
> > Quick translation:
> >
> >> Article 7. Sensitive data.
> >> 1. By Constitution, nobody can be forced to tell about their ideology,
> >> religion or beliefs.
> >
> >
> > And the fine for doing something like publishing the political
> affiliation
> > of people is stated here:
> > http://noticias.juridicas.com/base_datos/Admin/lo15-1999.t7.html#a45"Only"
> > between 300.000 and 600.000€.
> >
> > --
> > Dario Castañé
> > http://www.dario.im | http://twitter.com/im_dario
> >
> >
> >
> > ____________________________________________________
> > Pirate Parties International - General Talk
> > pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> > http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
> >
> ____________________________________________________
> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
>
> ____________________________________________________
> Pirate Parties International - General Talk
> pp.international.general at lists.pirateweb.net
> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pirateweb.net/pipermail/pp.international.general/attachments/20121007/6a44c3ae/attachment.html>