[pp.int.general] Consensus and power (before Re: Reflections on the PP GA)
peppecal at gmail.com
Sun Apr 20 19:47:27 CEST 2014
Il 20/apr/2014 18:57 "Martin Stolze" <pirate.martin at stolze.cc> ha scritto:
> + respect privacy and allows for proof of identity at the same time
That isn't really necessary in a consensus process where people don't have
any power, but their thoughts do. It isn't like you can vote twice. But I
assume it could be useful while enforcing the "everyone gets the same
speaking time" rule.
There is a software trying to facilitate the process as I understood it:
Vilfredo goes to Athens. (Spoiler: it doesn't work when people don't want
to reach a consensus... And it doesn't facilitate the "problem description"
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the pp.international.general