[pp.int.general] LQFB: status quo in Germany // was: liquid feedback papers and/or data?

Alessandro Ciofini alessandro.ciofini at gmail.com
Sun Apr 27 14:26:50 CEST 2014


2014-04-27 14:20 GMT+02:00 carlo von lynX <lynX at pirate.my.buttharp.org>:
> Here are some recent LQFB votings.
>
> https://lqfb.piratenpartei.de/lf/initiative/show/6544.html
>     Pirates dislike segregating forms of school
>     Ja: 148 (94%) · Enthaltung: 5 · Nein: 10 (6%) · Angenommen
>
> https://lqfb.piratenpartei.de/lf/initiative/show/6557.html
>     Regulations on how to use Pirate Party flags
>      Ja: 87 (64%) · Enthaltung: 8 · Nein: 49 (36%) · Angenommen
>
> https://lqfb.piratenpartei.de/lf/initiative/show/6580.html
>     Specific text that summarizes official Pirate values (editorial voting)
>      Ja: 39 (76%) · Enthaltung: 9 · Nein: 12 (24%) · Angenommen
>
> https://lqfb.piratenpartei.de/lf/initiative/show/6558.html
>     Decision to remove an unofficial pirate magazine from the website
>      Ja: 97 (58%) · Enthaltung: 19 · Nein: 70 (42%) · Angenommen
>
>      -> note how they still use simple majority in Germany,
>         that indeed is a very bad habit. I am glad in Italy
>         we try to at least have 2/3 if not 3/4 majorities
>         in order to work harder on convincing everyone.
>
> https://lqfb.piratenpartei.de/lf/initiative/show/6563.html
>     Idea for a train reform
>     Ja: 65 (76%) · Enthaltung: 1 · Nein: 20 (24%) · Angenommen
>
> https://lqfb.piratenpartei.de/lf/initiative/show/6573.html
>     Manifesto pro Rule of Law and against Medieval Shitstorm Practices
>     Ja: 46 (77%) · Enthaltung: 3 · Nein: 14 (23%) · Angenommen
>
> https://lqfb.piratenpartei.de/lf/initiative/show/6600.html
>     Idea on organizing party politics into "Streams"
>     Ja: 40 (55%) · Enthaltung: 3 · Nein: 33 (45%) · Angenommen
>

As we can see, only last vote is relative to April and it's only
40+3+33 = 76 total vote.
With a simple 1:2 delegation rate this means that less than 40 people
were involved.

So I think when we have such different reports the only way to
understood is to access real raw data.
Are they anywhere?


More information about the pp.international.general mailing list