<html><head><style type="text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style></head><body><div style="font-family:verdana,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:10pt"><div style="font-family: verdana,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;">----- Mensaje original ----<br>De: Richard M. Stallman <rms@gnu.org><br><div style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">Enviado: sábado, 23 de agosto, 2008 7:09:51<br>> To refer to the readers as "consumers" adopts a rather narrowly economic viewpoint on<br>> copyright. If we think that it is not solely an economic issue, we might do well to avoid the term<br>> "consumers".<br>><br>> Moreover, the fact that using a work of authorship does not consume it is a crucial basic point for<br>> our arguments<br><br>Don't worry, in the analysis of the joint viewpoints on culture and author's rights, this was the conclussion about that issue: "<span style="font-style: italic;">balance between
author's rights and <span style="font-weight: bold;">citizens'</span> rights on culture: We
agree on that there is inbalance and we want to pursue a balance</span>"; refering to citizens as consumers was avoided.<br><br>Moreover, such analysis is compliant with <a href="http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html"><span style="font-weight: bold;">UDHR article 27</span></a>, which states rights about culture for both citizens (paragraph 1) and authors (paragraph 2). Regards,<br><br><br> Carlos
Ayala<br> ( Aiarakoa )<br><br> Partido Pirata National Board's Chairman<br></div></div></div><br>__________________________________________________<br>Correo Yahoo!<br>Espacio para todos tus mensajes, antivirus y antispam ¡gratis! <br>Regístrate ya - http://correo.yahoo.es
</body></html>