<html><head><style type="text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style></head><body><div style="font-family:verdana,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:10pt"><div style="font-family: verdana,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;">----- Mensaje original ----<br>De: R Serkowski <roderick@ppau.info><br>Enviado: jueves, 28 de agosto, 2008 15:43:46<br>> <span style="letter-spacing: 0px;">Whilst I’m here, I may as well speak my mind on the PPI manifesto, and I’ll try to be as succinct<br>> as is possible; Will it act to define what the PPI will be? As yet, I’m still unsure as to what the<br>> construction of the PPI is, or will be. No doubt, as Carlos has pointed out, we need a document<br>> that enshrines all that we stand for, and this will of course be an ongoing development as we<br>> refine our philosophical, economic and policy arguments, and kudos to Carlos for pushing it as<br>> hard as he has, but I think more consideration
must be given to the practicalities of the<br>> organisation that will represent this international movement<br><br>I agree with that. While Manifesto is really important -and by the way, <a href="http://int.piratenpartei.de/Pirate_Manifesto_First_Draft"><span style="font-weight: bold;">let's gonna do the final effort</span></a> since next sunday is Stage One's deadline-, it's also essential to develop the inner mechanisms that allow us to be fully operative.<br><br>We actually dealt with such issues 7 months ago in Berlin; together with the encouraging of a Pirate Manifesto, French Parti Pirate encouraged a joint PPI's IT Group; Swedish Piratpartiet encouraged a joint PRs Group; and so on. Up to date, no one of these goals have been, not only fulfilled, but even seen how the works to get them fulfilled started. I truly think that, to be an active and operative movement, as Roderick points, we need to launch those mechanisms and task forces, and
secure that they work properly.<br><br></span><span style="letter-spacing: 0px;">> What is clear to me, and I think everyone on this list, is that for the movement to be successful<br>> in fundamentally altering current public perception, and effecting the legislative changes the<br>> national parties seek, we must have a strong, and united international body<br><br>> In my mind, the PPI should be constructed in the sense that it is a federation, rather than a<br>> party, a body representing all PP’s, and any other organisations that might also subscribe to the<br>> movement’s principles - and should act as a body which disperses information about all<br>> national parties and their affiliates, and the programs they are involved in nationally.<br><br>Many things regarding PPI have to be dealt; with Pirate Manifesto we've dealt with many, but not with all -specially with the organizative ones-. However, as you point, I think we
should have to.<br><br>> Of course, this is looking to the hopefully not too distant future, and perhaps I should<br>> concentrate on developing our national party here in Australia rather than wasting time on<br>> overly long, rather pointless emails such as this one, but I think its something we should think<br>> about as we continue to draft the manifesto<br><br>That's it: we should keep pushing towards the <a href="http://int.piratenpartei.de/Pirate_Manifesto_First_Draft"><span style="font-weight: bold;">First Draft</span></a>. The more parties involved in its editing -once we have the<a href="http://int.piratenpartei.de/Pirate_Manifesto_parties_at_a_glance#Common_stances"><span style="font-weight: bold;"> common stances</span></a>- the less amendments will be required. Sunday's coming! Regards,<br><br><br>
Carlos Ayala<br> ( Aiarakoa )<br><br>
Partido Pirata National Board's Chairman<br></span></div></div><br>__________________________________________________<br>Correo Yahoo!<br>Espacio para todos tus mensajes, antivirus y antispam ¡gratis! <br>Regístrate ya - http://correo.yahoo.es </body></html>