<html><head><style type="text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style></head><body><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:10pt"><div style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;">----- Mensaje original ----<br><div style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">De: Amelia Andersdotter <teirdes@gmail.com><br>Enviado: viernes, 5 de septiembre, 2008 17:04:09<br>> But in the States, most of the network infrastructure has been built by private enterprises who<br>> therefore also own it and should consequently be allowed to do whatever they want.<br><br>I'm not an expert in US laws, however -and we have here Andrew just in case that were required to fix my mistakes-:<br><br>- there are anti-monopolistic laws in US<br>- as long as a person is not allowed to hit people with a car, no matter if it's a car of his/her own, an ISP/State is not allowed to invade their users' privacy, no matter
whether that ISP/State has fully paid the net infrastructures or not<br><br>Neither the State nor ISPs are (theoretically) above the law; so they are not allowed to enhance monopolies, nor to invade people's privacy. Regards<br><br><br> Carlos
Ayala<br> ( Aiarakoa )<br><br> Partido Pirata National Board's Chairman<br></div></div></div><br>
</body></html>