<div dir="ltr">On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 4:30 PM, Carlos Ayala <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:aiarakoa@yahoo.es">aiarakoa@yahoo.es</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div><div style="font-family: verdana,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;"><div style="font-family: verdana,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;">Of course we can conclude that today's electronic voting machines don't meet such requirements and, thus, are not trustable. Regards</div>
</div></div></blockquote><div><br>That's my reading. Yes, electronic voting has some advantages, but if we focus on the main point, that is preventing rigged elections, manual counting of votes is the winner. And it will be for many years, until everyone has at least the same understanding on electronic voting machines than we have on manual counting of votes. <br>
<br>I can wait 8 hours to get the results of the elections.<br><br>Felix Robles<br></div></div></div>