<html><head><style type="text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style></head><body><div style="font-family:verdana,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:10pt"><div style="font-family: verdana,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;"><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">De:</span></b> Gagis <wildfinn@gmail.com><br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;"></span></b><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Enviado:</span></b> domingo, 9 de noviembre, 2008 11:59:02<br>> We are supposed to be a movement against excessive bureauracy... Having such in our own<br>> ranks<br>> is ridiculous.<br>><br>> This is not going well<br><br>As I said, representatives are up to counter this decision -and find me a replacement altogether-.<br><br>> I suggest we are as flexible with the process as we can, for it will not succeed at all at this rate.<br><br>Flexibility? There has been a deadline extension, for an extra week. I repeat, why nobody complained then? why
nobody said "<span style="font-style: italic;">hey let's gonna make this extra time a little longer</span>"? It's not about bureaucracy, it's about commitment -we agree something, we fulfil that something-. Regards,<br><br><br> Carlos
Ayala<br> ( Aiarakoa )<br><br> Partido Pirata National Board's Chairman<br> <br>P.S.: I have one doubt: which kind of amending did Piraattipuolue choose? individual, or as a party? I mean, if it was individual, it wasn't required to be Anton the one who propose the amendments; as he says he was busy, he might have delegated the duty into
another Finnish mate. Instead of blaming bureaucracy, you should think of why the amendment was proposed out of time.<br></div></div><br>
</body></html>