<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div><div>9 dec 2008 kl. 10.20 skrev Carlos Ayala:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 'times new roman'; font-size: 16px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0; ">I have one doubt: if 100 out of 8000 members attended the on-line meeting, I guess you have some sort of delegated vote -i.e., some, most or all members attending the on-line meeting would have acted as delegates, and non-attending members would have been allowed to delegate their vote to any of those delegates-, am I right?<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></span></blockquote></div><br><div>No, this is not the system used. One PP member, one vote. The fact that only a small amount of members exercised their right to vote doesn't change that.</div></body></html>