<html><head><style type="text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style></head><body><div style="font-family:verdana,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:10pt"><div style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; font-size: 12pt;"><font size="2" face="Tahoma"><hr size="1"><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">De:</span></b> Per von Zweigbergk <per.von.zweigbergk@piratpartiet.se><br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;"></span></b><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Enviado:</span></b> martes, 9 de diciembre, 2008 2:28:21<br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;"></span></b></font><div>> Just a slight clarification on the matter of the voting procedures -- it was not possible vote for no list per se. The software <br>> used for polling would not permit voting with zero choices selected. As such no "blank" vote could be cast.</div><div>><br></div><div>> It was, of course, possible to not vote at all -- an option exercised by the greater
part of our member population. (We have <br>> 8000 members, all elegible to cast their vote, and only about 100 people attended the on-line meeting.) But such an <br>> (in)action is not directly recorded<br><br>I have one doubt: if 100 out of 8000 members attended the on-line meeting, I guess you have some sort of delegated vote -i.e., some, most or all members attending the on-line meeting would have acted as delegates, and non-attending members would have been allowed to delegate their vote to any of those delegates-, am I right?
Regards,<br><br><br> Carlos Ayala<br> ( Aiarakoa
)<br><br> Partido Pirata National Board's Chairman<br></div></div></div><br>
</body></html>