<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div><div>8 dec 2008 kl. 15.32 skrev Mårten Fjällström:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: -webkit-monospace; font-size: 10px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0; ">7. Voting - there were 3 proposals, 2 competed fairly evenly, though the <br>election committees proposal won by some margin. The voting was <br>preferential where voting you could vote for one, two, three or no list. <br>If there had been no counterproposals, there would have been a straight <br>yes/no vote, a no handing the issue back to the board for further <br>deliberation. The voting was open for 27 hours, from saturday at 13:00 to <br>sunday at 16:00.</span></blockquote></div><br><div>Just a slight clarification on the matter of the voting procedures -- it was not possible vote for no list per se. The software used for polling would not permit voting with zero choices selected. As such no "blank" vote could be cast.</div><div><br></div><div>It was, of course, possible to not vote at all -- an option exercised by the greater part of our member population. (We have 8000 members, all elegible to cast their vote, and only about 100 people attended the on-line meeting.) But such an (in)action is not directly recorded.</div><div><br></div><div>-- </div><div>Per von Zweigbergk</div><div><br></div></body></html>