<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.5730.13" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV>Reinier Bakels wrote:<BR></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<BLOCKQUOTE cite=mid:B550A97F305640F6BCEC8C285950D865@RBB2008 type="cite">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.5730.13" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff>Well, I refer to a very specific concept in private
law, which is perhaps hard to explain to non-lawyers, but I don't suggest
changes to it. Patrimony is not a proper explanation/transformation, I
guess</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV>I'm sure you'll be able to explain yourself :) Just if you try</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Comic Sans MS" color=#0000ff size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Comic Sans MS" color=#0000ff size=2>Well, I don't want to
teach you basics of private law, if only because you don't believe me
anyway, as is demonstrated below. </FONT><BR><FONT
color=#0000ff></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff>Authors rights (in the continental tradition) are
divided in to moral and exploitation rights. Exploitation is economic. For
existing copyrights, the government should respect justified expectations it
created. That's all</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>As long as you actually have read what I said, I talk about the new legal
framework -i.e., the framework for new works-.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Comic Sans MS" color=#0000ff size=2>Well, at least at some
point of our conversation we talked about old works. And thereis a point in
talking about old works. But because it is immesely difficult to convince you,
I did not have an opportunity yet to discuss my suggestions in that
field. </FONT><BR></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE cite=mid:B550A97F305640F6BCEC8C285950D865@RBB2008 type="cite">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.5730.13" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff>No, I did answer it, but you thought I did
not. IIRC PP proposes a 5 year (exploitation) copyright. Then it is
<B>unavoidable</B> to consider it a property right. Only full abolishment
allows it not to be considered as such</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV>False. There are not just abolishment and property rights as solutions;
you just think of commercial rights as property. Those are two different
things, and actually you can ask people here whether they think of commercial
rights as property rights or not. I already explained in my last mail some
approaches for configuring author's commercial rights without considering them
as property rights.<BR><BR><FONT face="Comic Sans MS" color=#0000ff
size=2>Well, this is what I meant above. You just don't believe me. Assume
youare right. Then that iseven more a reason not to believe my explanation on
the property rights concept ...</FONT></DIV><FONT face="Comic Sans MS"
color=#0000ff size=2></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"><FONT
face="Comic Sans MS" color=#0000ff size=2>reinier</FONT>
<DIV><BR>
Carlos
Ayala<BR>
( Aiarakoa )<BR><BR></DIV>
<DIV>
Partido Pirata National Board's Chairman</DIV>
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>____________________________________________________<BR>Pirate Parties
International - General
Talk<BR>pp.international.general@lists.pirateweb.net<BR>http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>