Reinier (and Carlos),<br><br>I consider this conversation to be very productive. It's very important for us to know (and understand) as many points of views as possible about the "c-word" issue. I really don't mind who is the majority.<br>
<br>While I agree that this current discussion may be over, don't hesitate to start new discussions. If strong arguments are needed, so it be, jsut don't take it personal.<br>
<br>Cheers,<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 6:03 PM, Reinier Bakels <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:r.bakels@pr.unimaas.nl">r.bakels@pr.unimaas.nl</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
This discussion is not anymore constructive. I think each national PP should be independant and just follow general principles of the PP international network.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Right. perhaps the majority should go on together, while the minority should go for independence. The past days, most of the conversation has been between two people, Carlos and me, so it is hard to judge (from that) who is the majority ....<br>
<br>
reinier <br>
____________________________________________________<br>
Pirate Parties International - General Talk<br>
<a href="mailto:pp.international.general@lists.pirateweb.net" target="_blank">pp.international.general@lists.pirateweb.net</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general" target="_blank">http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br>