<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Reinier Bakels wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:B3A8F91412C04C6D8D4FBC5F8016DB78@RBB2008"
type="cite">
<title></title>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1">
<meta content="MSHTML 6.00.5730.13" name="GENERATOR">
<style></style>
<blockquote
style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(0, 0, 255); padding-right: 0px; padding-left: 5px; margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 0px;">
<div><font color="#000000">Aah: this is just about property, not
about intellectual property. It is (as I explained before) about the
interface between aopyright etc. and private law. Such a provision
moreor less states the obvious.</font></div>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
Wrong. It is about <i>intellectual pro...whatever</i>, <a
href="http://noticias.juridicas.com/base_datos/Privado/cc.l2t4.html#c3">visit
the link</a>! look at the chapter's name ("<i>Chapter III. On
intellectual property</i>")! Such a provisions attempted (and attempt)
to equate author's rights to some sort of property since XIXth century.
</body>
</html>