<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Reinier Bakels <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:r.bakels@pr.unimaas.nl">r.bakels@pr.unimaas.nl</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<blockquote style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(0, 0, 255); padding-right: 0px; padding-left: 5px; margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 0px;"><div class="Ih2E3d">
<div>Reinier Bakels wrote: </div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(0, 0, 255); padding-right: 0px; padding-left: 5px; margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 0px;">
<div><font color="#000000">Aah: this is just about property, not about
intellectual property. It is (as I explained before) about the interface
between aopyright etc. and private law. Such a provision moreor less
states the obvious.</font></div></blockquote></blockquote>Wrong. It is about
<i>intellectual pro...whatever</i>, <a href="http://noticias.juridicas.com/base_datos/Privado/cc.l2t4.html#c3" target="_blank">visit
the link</a>! look at the chapter's name ("<i>Chapter III. On intellectual
property</i>")! Such a provisions attempted (and attempt) to equate author's
rights to some sort of property since XIXth century.
</div><p>
</p><div><font color="#ff0000">You learn slowly. Copyright is (indeed)
considered as a property right - but not in the French revolution
sense, but in the Rome law sense. You are mistaken by at least 1500
years.</font></div>
<div><font color="#ff0000"></font> </div>
<div><font color="#ff0000">reinier</font> <br></div></blockquote></div>
</blockquote></div><br>Please, don't use red in your responses, it's very uncomfortable to read.<br>