<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE></TITLE>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.5730.13" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>Reinier Bakels wrote: </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE cite=mid:B3A8F91412C04C6D8D4FBC5F8016DB78@RBB2008 type="cite">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.5730.13" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(0,0,255) 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV><FONT color=#000000>Aah: this is just about property, not about
intellectual property. It is (as I explained before) about the interface
between aopyright etc. and private law. Such a provision moreor less
states the obvious.</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE>Wrong. It is about
<I>intellectual pro...whatever</I>, <A
href="http://noticias.juridicas.com/base_datos/Privado/cc.l2t4.html#c3">visit
the link</A>! look at the chapter's name ("<I>Chapter III. On intellectual
property</I>")! Such a provisions attempted (and attempt) to equate author's
rights to some sort of property since XIXth century.
<P>
<DIV><FONT color=#ff0000>You learn slowly. Copyright is (indeed)
considered as a property right - but not in the French revolution
sense, but in the Rome law sense. You are mistaken by at least 1500
years.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#ff0000></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT
color=#ff0000>reinier</FONT> <BR></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>