Then, the most secure places in the world should be the prisons (and the submarines too), right?<br>That idea is completely wrong, as in prisons there are plenty of drugs, violence and murders. The extreme surveillance doesn't work at all.<br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Reinier Bakels <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:r.bakels@planet.nl">r.bakels@planet.nl</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Increased surveillance does not improve overall safety.<br>
</blockquote></div>
The initial, intuitive perception is that it does. And it is definitely not entirely nonsensical. It does contribute to the human right of integrity, at least in a subjective manner.<br>
People do feal more at ease with e.g. camera surveillance in public transportation means late at night.<br>
I requires some knowledge to understand the problems of mass surveillance.<br>
But politics is not an intellectual game. One has only one opportunity to make a first impression.<br><font color="#888888">
reinier <br></font><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c">
____________________________________________________<br>
Pirate Parties International - General Talk<br>
<a href="mailto:pp.international.general@lists.pirateweb.net" target="_blank">pp.international.general@lists.pirateweb.net</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general" target="_blank">http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>