<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Christian Hufgard <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:pp@christian-hufgard.de">pp@christian-hufgard.de</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">
>> And as far as I know, Pirates don't want to force everybody to release<br>
>> the<br>
>> sources for every products he sells. Or do we want this?<br>
>><br>
> There's another reason why we don't need the 3d studio max file of a<br>
> movie:<br>
> when we watch a movie we don't run the risk of executing on our machine<br>
> something we don't want without our knowledge. Perhaps windows is secretly<br>
> giving microsoft our personal information, for example. When we listen to<br>
> a<br>
> song, we don't run that risk (or if we do is because of the software,<br>
> which should be free).<br>
<br>
</div>Thats another reason. You were first talking about the possibility to<br>
improve something. The potential danger is something completly else. When<br>
did you read the last time every line of code your kernel executed during<br>
startup? Or did an in depth-analysis of your browser?<br>
<div><div></div><br></div></blockquote></div>It's called a freedom for a reason. Not an obligation.<br>