On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Christian Hufgard <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:pp@christian-hufgard.de">pp@christian-hufgard.de</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im"><br></div>That's exactly why I propagate the use of sharing of free content<br>
instead of using unfree stuff. :)<br>
<div class="im"><br></div></blockquote><div>Free content vs. unfree content is interesting to discuss, I went through sites such as <a href="http://jamendo.com">jamendo.com</a> that claim to distribute free music and listened carefully on some of the tunes, it did not take me long time to find a lot inspired from unfree content where in some cases with the original artists voice in the tune.. It is up to the "artist" that releases the music to decide if it is free content where later a court of law may deem it is not due to how inspired the "artist" was of unfree content. This happens in the commercial music industry and artists loose there revenue in such court cases so how can you be sure that the music that is claimed to be free actually is free?</div>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div>- Nicolas</div><div> PPI / PPSE member</div></div>