<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Christian Hufgard <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:pp@christian-hufgard.de">pp@christian-hufgard.de</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">coretx wrote:<br>
> PP might be smart when they talk about how to eliminate deadweight loss,<br>
> instead of eliminating "artificial scarcity"<br>
> Artificial scarcity is not the issue, the consequence can be.<br>
> And gues what, deadweight loss is one of the worst nightmares of free<br>
> market liberalists, right wing and left wing extremists etc.<br>
> Restoring the free market equilibrium is good for both<br>
> consumers/citizens _and_ for business.<br>
> If explained the right way, no sane person could argue against us.<br>
<br>
</div>Except those who lost their jobs the last year due to the free financial<br>
market...<font color="#888888"><br></font></blockquote><br>LOL.. so the market collapsed because the government wasn't interfering and regulating it enough, huh?<br></div>