<br>
<div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">I agree with you about that.  In addition, the basic idea of the treaty<br>

is based on carbon allowance trading, which means instead of reducing<br>
emissions it will probably just lead to fraud.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/johann-hari/johann-hari-leaders-of-the-rich-world-are-enacting-a-giant-fraud-1837963.html" target="_blank">http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/johann-hari/johann-hari-leaders-of-the-rich-world-are-enacting-a-giant-fraud-1837963.html</a><br>

<br></blockquote><div><br>It might be better for the planet if carbon trading was simply outright fraud (with no effort at all to actually fund anything). I recently watched &#39;The Carbon Connection&#39; and it seems that massive eucalyptus monoculture plantations are causing about as much environmental damage in developing countries as the carbon emissions they&#39;re supposed to offset.<br>
<br><br></div></div>