<HTML dir=ltr><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=unicode" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.18702"></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV dir=ltr id=idOWAReplyText24854>
<DIV dir=ltr>My understanding is that the latest generation of full body scanners does not require a human to assess images: it is done by a computer (that does not know what a penis is!). If the computer says that the person is suspect, further testing is done (but afaik not using the image).</DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr>I am not saying that customes authorities have solved the privacy problem, but I do believe that a smarter PP response is required to this new(?) development. It should be avoided that we cry out for privacy - while the respone is: privacy is not affected at all, the computer analysind the images is "neutral".</DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr>Does anyone know whether these scanners use X-ray (R"ontgen)? If they do, they are a health risk, however low the dose is. X-rays are high energy radiation (for thoese not familiar in quantum physics: this is not a matter of the amout of energy in watts: it is entirely determined by the frequency of the radiation - based on Plancks formula). The actual percentage of people contracting cancer because of these scans may be low, but a high number of people multiplied by a low percentrage still is a substantial number of people. A cynical calculation would be to compare that number to the number of potential terrorist attack victims. I guess the latter i lower. But rather I would say: any checking method affecting health is *wrong*. Affecting privacy is bad enough.</DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr>reinier</DIV></DIV></BODY></HTML>