<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div><blockquote type="cite"><div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px;">I would like to make something clear about the nature of the Statutes being discussed. My understanding is as follows;</div><br>- These Statutes are for PPI and are legally required (eventually) for it to be an official organisation.<br><br></blockquote><snip><br><blockquote type="cite"><br>Will Tovey<br>CAO, Pirate Parties International<font class="Apple-style-span" color="#000000"><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#144FAE"><br></font></font></blockquote><br></div><div>Will,</div><div><br></div><div>This little snippet of information prompts a whole lot of questions:</div><div><br></div><div>- 'Official organisation': But what kind of organization?</div><div><br></div><div>- 'Legally required': By the laws of which country?</div><div><br></div><div>As the founders of TPB, Bono, and international bankers all agree, picking the right place to set up the right 'organization' can give huge benefits. Given that PPI could, in theory, be set up anywhere in the world, which options have been considered so far? In that context, what kinds of legal entity have been considered?</div><div><br></div><div>Will the choice of locations and organizational entities be something on the agenda for the conference? If the choice influences the statutes needed, surely this should be decided before the statutes themselves? </div><div><br></div><div>Best regards,</div><div><br></div><div>Eric Priezkalns</div></body></html>