<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Rodrigo/Jorge,<br>
<br>
En/na Rodrigo Pereira ha escrit:<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:o2p114492e41004230509w58bcb4dk8072f039ef960bd0@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
I would never vote to make a remote conference in India, Vietnam,<br>
Cambodja, Thailand or even Singapore for European people, as pings are<br>
never below 300 ms and usually around 400-500ms. Now, after my tests, I<br>
would also don't vote Brazil until it gets better Internet<br>
communicacions with Europe, as previously said.<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<span id="result_box" class="long_text"><span
style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"
title="Isto é irrelevante porque não estamos discutindo projetos de Conferência, isto é só um convite."></span></span>This
is irrelevant because we are not discussing conference projects, this
is just an invitation. </blockquote>
Then your invitation is also irrelevant, isn't it?<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:o2p114492e41004230509w58bcb4dk8072f039ef960bd0@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">Using a good hardware and a good compression, and one of
our icecast2 servers in Sweden, I think we can do a very good
streaming. Please do not disqualify an invitation using a technical
justification. That does not change the value of the invitation. And
this is unnecessary.<br>
</blockquote>
Cross-continental delay in communications has little to do with your
hardware (unless using SatCom), so, you are (again) wrong.<br>
<br>
An invitation must be checked in all aspects: easiness/affordability of
traveling to that place as well as granting a decent remote
participation. If some point fails, the invitation weakens.<br>
<br>
Unnecessary is blaming other people, crying to get cash back when some
people donated for you and a lot more lost personal cash. Unnecessary
is telling others that they have prejudices when they
reply/answer/comment on something you don't like.<br>
<br>
Sorry, Brazil might be a nice country but it's not the place for a low
budget congress with remote delegates using VoIP, as VoIP will be
CRAPPY for 5/6 of delegates. That is a fact. Without VoIP, any remote
delegate will feel impotent, as it happened last time.<br>
<br>
It would also be a bad place because of people like you two, but this
is a personal opinion, not a fact.<br>
<br>
Is that a prejudice or you simply want it and don't accept any FACT
against it? Stop blaming other people saying they have prejudices just
because we don't share your points.<br>
<br>
<br>
Grow up, you are the ones with prejudices.<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:o2p114492e41004230509w58bcb4dk8072f039ef960bd0@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite"><span id="result_box" class="short_text"><span
style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"
title="E isto é desnecessário"></span></span>Rodrigo.<br>
</blockquote>
Kenneth<br>
</body>
</html>