<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
On 17.10.2010 13:23, Justus Römeth wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:4CBADC9C.3040505@dfpx.de" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
Boris,<br>
<br>
Your answers went further than that. And when you have content
only available in flash you are telling those who want to view it
that they will need flash to watch it. Don't tell me that putting
the info in html or PDF as well would be an unbearable amount of
extra work (Not to mention hmtl 5 in the near future).<br>
</blockquote>
I'm in no way related to the content. Furthermore, I explicitly
support that any content be published in as many formats as
possible. My harsh response just went to counter Mr. Stallmann's
recurring attack on "non-free" software.<br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:4CBADC9C.3040505@dfpx.de" type="cite"> That
said, I do think apple is stupid by not using flash on their
mobile devices, and I don't share Richard's concerns about flash.
Marking those as 'paranoia' and accusing people that disagree with
you as 'fucking with our minds' is childish at best.<br>
</blockquote>
I explicitly told that to Richard only, in view of our many previous
disagreements which he has voiced once again.<br>
My opinion of Apple's mobile devices is about as low as my opinion
of the FSF;)<br>
<br>
Best RegARRRds,<br>
Boris<br>
</body>
</html>