<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Tahoma
}
--></style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
I personally don't agree, civil disobedience is perfectly reasonable when <br>those in powers have their own agenda and don't pay attention.<br>We should focus on changing those laws and let anon alone, it's not like<br>they are going to say Ok and stop the attacks anyway xD<br><br>-rodrigo<br>> Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 15:38:35 -0500<br>> From: ktetch@gmail.com<br>> To: pp.international.general@lists.pirateweb.net<br>> Subject: Re: [pp.int.general] PPi ask Anonymous to stop Payback<br>> <br>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----<br>> Hash: SHA1<br>> <br>> On 11/20/2010 3:13 PM, Partidul Piratilor wrote:<br>> > First: We protest against the subject line: it was PP US and PP UK who<br>> > wrote the letter.<br>> <br>> Choms is quite clearly an O:P member. As the rest of his email's have<br>> shown, he's not really one for facts.<br>> <br>> > <br>> > Second: Romanian PP does not endorse the way things were said in the<br>> > letter. The Operation was already fading and the new dispute only serves<br>> > the interests of MPAA and the likes.<br>> <br>> Well, yes. We did write the letter fairly and without mass accusation.<br>> The way certain members of it have responded does give the sense of an<br>> agent provocateur involved with O:P. While the new 'dispute' may play to<br>> the MPAA and their ilk, it currently has not done so to anything like<br>> the degree the original O:P did.<br>> <br>> > It's interesting to see if any link exists between the FBI investigation<br>> > and the fact that some pirates got suddenly on the side of the law? <br>> <br>> We in the US have always been on the side of the law. Now, wanting some<br>> laws changed, that's different from breaking those laws. That way<br>> anarchy lies, and anarchy serves no-one.<br>> <br>> >It's<br>> > interesting to see how there are laws you respect (computer crime) and<br>> > laws you don't (copyright). Any criteria on choosing them?<br>> <br>> Actually, we respect *ALL* laws (it's a requirement for a political<br>> party in the US, if it isn't in Romania, great, you're operating in a<br>> much nicer, easier system than we are. The likes of Sanziana Buruiana<br>> wouldn't even get started here, except in maybe one or two states that<br>> have sane ballot access laws). There are some laws we want changed<br>> though. However, the computer crimes one isn't one of them, as it's<br>> written pretty fairly, and does deal with a problem.<br>> <br>> > <br>> > PS: Please do not bother to respond. Although it contains question marks<br>> > it's only a statement.<br>> > <br>> > Cristian<br>> > Romanian PP spokesperson<br>> > <br>> > <br>> > <br>> > ____________________________________________________<br>> > Pirate Parties International - General Talk<br>> > pp.international.general@lists.pirateweb.net<br>> > http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general<br>> <br>> <br>> - -- <br>> Andrew Norton<br>> http://ktetch.blogspot.com<br>> Tel: (352)6-KTETCH [352-658-3824]<br>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)<br>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/<br>> <br>> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJM6DHLAAoJECjjuYTW3X5H1yAH/2CAduJccMEmciW10x6yh8+N<br>> Ia6hZ1eVhLtkBUilJ+stOAILcwqhf8/6dPH31vwuAlrM+cwdoEPq/MfkVg8oCiDo<br>> S9d0aI/xGS6XP+kkCOp40GRCWrcYSIsR5EwXG4BkNeteOqlNoDRVFYIRH9fLjn3q<br>> psW0EtzEuEuPXF3xLpa1Xf+4oiAo3NdjTxSfjX+BfmAHlJgOvqURVRnX/6qIbaRP<br>> WL56nFq/xTxqWXUbKfzEL31ylIxLF88LXtOT5JbVDHLKz0HCWUla3M7X85ZUpsZb<br>> kzZL/iHzkKqUxVmpPVTQ38w0JJmnGPTVegvnH2a5GFsQ+OHtG578O+sdO606Uzw=<br>> =eKzv<br>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>> ____________________________________________________<br>> Pirate Parties International - General Talk<br>> pp.international.general@lists.pirateweb.net<br>> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general<br> </body>
</html>