@ Choms: I am not defending or accusing anybody by stating that it I think it is naive not to have backups of your data, especially when someone else is responsible of the hardware it is stored on.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Justus Römeth <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:squig@dfpx.de">squig@dfpx.de</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div>Moin Kenneth</div><div><br></div>We are (or rather our leadership is) slow, so actually there is nothing decided yet.<div><br></div><div>IMO all you write is true, but smaller PPs can win much more than PPDE in this case, we already have our name out there. Anyways, it's not like we actually oppose you, is it? Afaik nobody official from PPDE has put forward an opinion to the matter, everything else were just individual opinions.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Having said that, the fact that the US is more of a police state than we would like, and that it is unlikely anybody is gonna get his data back is a shame, but probably nothing a court ruling in Europe will change. And I doubt we could win a case in the US (if we were to try that we should get the EFF on board, however).<br>
<br>Kind regards</div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><div><br></div></font></span><div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">-J</font></span><div><div class="h5"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Kenneth Peiruza <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:kenneth@pirata.cat" target="_blank">kenneth@pirata.cat</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
PP-DE is acting SHAMEFULLY in this case.<br>
<br>
What about the personal data of people using MU? didn't you had a
principle about defending privacy?<br>
<br>
Shame.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Al 29/01/12 15:37, En/na Choms ha escrit:
<div><div><blockquote type="cite">Presumption of innocence? Oh, wait, that doesn't
exists on the US... if so, imho, you have to wait for a trial
before condemn someone... but who cares about justice? :)<br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">2012/1/29 Christian Hufgard <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:pp@christian-hufgard.de" target="_blank">pp@christian-hufgard.de</a>></span><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div>On 29.01.2012 11:29, Josep Sànchez wrote:<br>
>> You are also allowed to lose your money by
investing in criminal<br>
>> stock companies.<br>
><br>
> That's not the actual situation. In my country when
anybody does any<br>
> action it is responsible for the collateral damages it
might cause, and<br>
> it's even more serious if they could have avoided or
previewed them and<br>
> didn't do it. It doesn't matter if its an individual, a
government<br>
> officer or a policeman.<br>
> Are laws different in your country and in the USA?<br>
<br>
</div>
Don't know about the US, but in germany police in nearly never
made<br>
responsible for whatever they do. We had even our parties
server raided<br>
a couple of days before an election without any
consequences...<br>
<div><br>
> MU was not a "criminal company" *until* Virginia State
authorities told<br>
> the Feds to seize it.<br>
<br>
</div>
Of course they were, otherwise the hadn't been raided. (A
judge or a<br>
jury still might decide something different)<br>
<div><br>
> People could hire their services until that moment<br>
> as they could do with any other company in the net.
Financial services,<br>
> ISP's and even US tax authorities were operating
normally with MU. Are<br>
> they also criminals?.<br>
<br>
</div>
What for was Al Capone sent to Alcatraz? Murder or not paying
his taxes?<br>
<div><br>
<br>
>> Well, that's your point of view. I don't think the
Feds or Virginia<br>
>> State are responsible to keep MU running. And if
the court determines<br>
>> the raid was illegal, they gonna have to pay a
pretty huge amount of<br>
>> money to Kim and his fellows.<br>
><br>
> First was a matter of money, now of who has to run the
service, what<br>
> next? :)<br>
<br>
</div>
Finally it's the matter of reason. If the law in the US does
not force<br>
the Feds to keep a service online they were told to shut down,
why<br>
should they do so?<br>
<span><font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
Christian<br>
</font></span>
<div>
<div>____________________________________________________<br>
Pirate Parties International - General Talk<br>
<a href="mailto:pp.international.general@lists.pirateweb.net" target="_blank">pp.international.general@lists.pirateweb.net</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general" target="_blank">http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general</a><br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<br>
<fieldset></fieldset>
<br>
<pre>____________________________________________________
Pirate Parties International - General Talk
<a href="mailto:pp.international.general@lists.pirateweb.net" target="_blank">pp.international.general@lists.pirateweb.net</a>
<a href="http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general" target="_blank">http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div></div></div>
<br>____________________________________________________<br>
Pirate Parties International - General Talk<br>
<a href="mailto:pp.international.general@lists.pirateweb.net" target="_blank">pp.international.general@lists.pirateweb.net</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general" target="_blank">http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div>
</blockquote></div><br>