<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Tahoma
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>
oh, yeah, it would... if common sense were not the least common of senses among most of the people ;(<br><br>is it about not wanting one more definition, or not wanting any definition at all?<br><br>we can not work in a void where everyone understands what he pleases about everything and all, and not one word has the same meaning for any two different people, organisations, parties, etc.<br><br>at this moment we might even have trouble getting two individuals to agree on what ir really and ultimately means... to be a pirate. do we favour an "everyone can handle his own definition" approach for popularity's sake, or do we really know what we are... and what we are not?<br><br>do we dare to speak about it?<br><br>Antonio.<br><br><br><div><div id="SkyDrivePlaceholder"></div>> Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 17:24:44 +0200<br>> From: zzbbyy@gmail.com<br>> To: pp.international.general@lists.pirateweb.net<br>> Subject: Re: [pp.int.general] [RULING] 2012-5 (Validity of 2012 GA Conference)<br>> <br>> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Antonio Garcia <ningunotro@hotmail.com> wrote:<br>> > decided democratically... is not godgiven fact. it is not only the vote,<br>> > even nested a few levels, but how you get to the vote... if ever needed.<br>> > please define methodology and circumstances.<br>> <br>> Do we need any more definitions and other theory here? Woudn't be<br>> common sense enough?<br>> <br>> Z.<br>> <br>> -- <br>> Zbigniew Lukasiak<br>> http://brudnopis.blogspot.com/<br>> http://perlalchemy.blogspot.com/<br>> ____________________________________________________<br>> Pirate Parties International - General Talk<br>> pp.international.general@lists.pirateweb.net<br>> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general<br></div> </div></body>
</html>