<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Tahoma
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>
decided democratically... is not godgiven fact. it is not only the vote, even nested a few levels, but how you get to the vote... if ever needed. please define methodology and circumstances.<br><br><div><div id="SkyDrivePlaceholder"></div>> Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 15:42:36 +0200<br>> From: zzbbyy@gmail.com<br>> To: pp.international.general@lists.pirateweb.net<br>> Subject: Re: [pp.int.general] [RULING] 2012-5 (Validity of 2012 GA Conference)<br>> <br>> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Antonio Garcia <ningunotro@hotmail.com> wrote:<br>> > ethica is among other things about how not to alienate those that for<br>> > coherence's sake can not afford to drop ethical behaviour.<br>> ><br>> > it can be treated separately only insofar as the practice and the pragmatism<br>> > treated separately are not a simple way to sidetrack and ditch it.<br>> ><br>> > a pragmatic lack of ethic, for instance... would not be accepted, or at<br>> > least should not be accepted.<br>> ><br>> > i know what kind of associations/gatherings i do not want to be part of...<br>> > and i guess many other do know too.<br>> <br>> Hmm - one more question: was ''voting on how to vote to decide the<br>> method of voting' very ethical because every aspect was decided<br>> democratically?<br>> <br>> -- <br>> Zbigniew Lukasiak<br>> http://brudnopis.blogspot.com/<br>> http://perlalchemy.blogspot.com/<br>> ____________________________________________________<br>> Pirate Parties International - General Talk<br>> pp.international.general@lists.pirateweb.net<br>> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general<br></div> </div></body>
</html>