<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"></head><body >That is exactly.what we said we approved in my email xD<br><br><br><font size="2">Salut!</font> <br>Anouk Neeteson <jakobsheep@gmail.com> escribió:<br>Hi Kenneth, thanks for the quick reply. Ans as always, an answer gives<br>another question. The sanctions mentioned in Artículo 45 are only for<br>those that enforce 'confession', it does NOT state:" It's is strictly<br>forbidden to reveal the ideology of a person." But it would be like:<br>"It is strictly forbidden to enforce to have someone reveal his/her<br>ideologie." So I don not understand the argumentation NOT to share the<br>general assembly's minutes because of the LOPD.<br>In the Netherlands if someone does not want to have their name<br>published, they got a pseudonym for that purpose. Why don't you do it<br>the same way in Catalonia? Especially since it is so essential for the<br>transparency as you claim to support.<br><br>Anouk Neeteson<br>member international coordination Belgium and the Netherlands.<br>(proposing an international coordination team in France next AG in Montreuil)<br><br><br>On 7 October 2012 09:23, Dario <dario@pirata.cat> wrote:<br>> 2012/10/7 Anouk Neeteson <jakobsheep@gmail.com><br>>><br>>> Hi Kenneth, can you give me the precise text in the Spanish LOPD ? I<br>>> am very curious how it states / defines: " It's is strictly forbidden<br>>> to reveal the ideology of a person." ? And I can not find it, but<br>>> again my Spanish is really bad :)<br>><br>><br>> http://noticias.juridicas.com/base_datos/Admin/lo15-1999.t2.html#a7<br>><br>>> Artículo 7. Datos especialmente protegidos.<br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>> 1. De acuerdo con lo establecido en el apartado 2 del artículo 16 de la<br>>> Constitución, nadie podrá ser obligado a declarar sobre su ideología,<br>>> religión o creencias.<br>><br>><br>> Quick translation:<br>><br>>> Article 7. Sensitive data.<br>>> 1. By Constitution, nobody can be forced to tell about their ideology,<br>>> religion or beliefs.<br>><br>><br>> And the fine for doing something like publishing the political affiliation<br>> of people is stated here:<br>> http://noticias.juridicas.com/base_datos/Admin/lo15-1999.t7.html#a45 "Only"<br>> between 300.000 and 600.000€.<br>><br>> --<br>> Dario Castañé<br>> http://www.dario.im | http://twitter.com/im_dario<br>><br>><br>><br>> ____________________________________________________<br>> Pirate Parties International - General Talk<br>> pp.international.general@lists.pirateweb.net<br>> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general<br>><br>____________________________________________________<br>Pirate Parties International - General Talk<br>pp.international.general@lists.pirateweb.net<br>http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general<br> </body>