Hi,<div><br></div><div>the second article states:</div><div><br></div><div><span style="font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:11px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)">"2. Sólo con el consentimiento expreso y por escrito del afectado podrán ser objeto de tratamiento los datos de carácter personal que revelen la ideología, afiliación sindical, religión y creencias."</span><br>
<br>what means that to reveal the ideology of a person, he needs to express his written consent to publish that information.</div><div><br></div><div>The only way to keep it public is leaving their names out, or using acronyms (K.P. instead of Kenneth Peiruza). Piratas de Galicia does the first one:</div>
<div><br></div><div><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:13px;line-height:19px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)">"O actual tesoureiro _NON_PUBLICADO_ atópase ocupado e non ten tempo para levar as funcións de tesoureiría. _NON_PUBLICADO_ ofreceuse para levar a tesourería. Vótase o cambio e apróbase por unanimidade."</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:13px;line-height:19px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)"><br></span></div><div><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span style="line-height:19px">Translation: "The current treasurer _NO_PUBLISHED_ is busy and has no time to ....."</span></font></div>
<div><br></div><div>I guess Pirata.CAT can do the same, but they would need to change it.</div><div><br></div><div>Regards.</div><div><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Anouk Neeteson <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jakobsheep@gmail.com" target="_blank">jakobsheep@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi Kenneth, thanks for the quick reply. Ans as always, an answer gives<br>
another question. The sanctions mentioned in Artículo 45 are only for<br>
those that enforce 'confession', it does NOT state:" It's is strictly<br>
forbidden to reveal the ideology of a person." But it would be like:<br>
"It is strictly forbidden to enforce to have someone reveal his/her<br>
ideologie." So I don not understand the argumentation NOT to share the<br>
general assembly's minutes because of the LOPD.<br>
In the Netherlands if someone does not want to have their name<br>
published, they got a pseudonym for that purpose. Why don't you do it<br>
the same way in Catalonia? Especially since it is so essential for the<br>
transparency as you claim to support.<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
Anouk Neeteson<br>
member international coordination Belgium and the Netherlands.<br>
(proposing an international coordination team in France next AG in Montreuil)<br>
</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
On 7 October 2012 09:23, Dario <<a href="mailto:dario@pirata.cat">dario@pirata.cat</a>> wrote:<br>
> 2012/10/7 Anouk Neeteson <<a href="mailto:jakobsheep@gmail.com">jakobsheep@gmail.com</a>><br>
>><br>
>> Hi Kenneth, can you give me the precise text in the Spanish LOPD ? I<br>
>> am very curious how it states / defines: " It's is strictly forbidden<br>
>> to reveal the ideology of a person." ? And I can not find it, but<br>
>> again my Spanish is really bad :)<br>
><br>
><br>
> <a href="http://noticias.juridicas.com/base_datos/Admin/lo15-1999.t2.html#a7" target="_blank">http://noticias.juridicas.com/base_datos/Admin/lo15-1999.t2.html#a7</a><br>
><br>
>> Artículo 7. Datos especialmente protegidos.<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> 1. De acuerdo con lo establecido en el apartado 2 del artículo 16 de la<br>
>> Constitución, nadie podrá ser obligado a declarar sobre su ideología,<br>
>> religión o creencias.<br>
><br>
><br>
> Quick translation:<br>
><br>
>> Article 7. Sensitive data.<br>
>> 1. By Constitution, nobody can be forced to tell about their ideology,<br>
>> religion or beliefs.<br>
><br>
><br>
> And the fine for doing something like publishing the political affiliation<br>
> of people is stated here:<br>
> <a href="http://noticias.juridicas.com/base_datos/Admin/lo15-1999.t7.html#a45" target="_blank">http://noticias.juridicas.com/base_datos/Admin/lo15-1999.t7.html#a45</a> "Only"<br>
> between 300.000 and 600.000€.<br>
><br>
> --<br>
> Dario Castañé<br>
> <a href="http://www.dario.im" target="_blank">http://www.dario.im</a> | <a href="http://twitter.com/im_dario" target="_blank">http://twitter.com/im_dario</a><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
</div></div><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">> ____________________________________________________<br>
> Pirate Parties International - General Talk<br>
> <a href="mailto:pp.international.general@lists.pirateweb.net">pp.international.general@lists.pirateweb.net</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general" target="_blank">http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general</a><br>
><br>
____________________________________________________<br>
Pirate Parties International - General Talk<br>
<a href="mailto:pp.international.general@lists.pirateweb.net">pp.international.general@lists.pirateweb.net</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general" target="_blank">http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>