<div dir="ltr">Below is an official mail sent to the Board of PPI.<br><br>We
have yet to receive any sort of acknowledgement that it was received or
discussed by the Board. So in the interests of transparency I thought
the best course of action was to post it to the general discussion list
as the formal means of communication seem to be failing.<br>
<br><div><span>Greetings</span></div><div><br></div><div><span>I
am writing on behalf of Pirate Party Australia to lodge a formal
protest concerning the conduct of the previous two Pirate Party
International General Assemblies and the malaise it has caused </span><span>within our</span><span> organisation. </span></div><div><br></div><div><span>The
problem is exacerbated by the lack of response to the resignation of
the Court of Arbitration. The CoA should be working to address the root
causes of the in-fighting that is a feature of the PPI discussion lists
over the last months and could provide added insight into these feuds
and to help bring them to a resolution.</span></div><div><br></div><div><span>The
threat to sue the CoA illustrates problems within PPI. The Constitution
is being routinely ignored. The threat itself demonstrates a lack of
respect for the rules governing the International. How can an
organisation function when a body elected to apply the constitution is
threatened with Lawyers when they make a decision a member Party doesn't
like?</span></div><div><br></div><div><span>The
Constitution states that only one member be allowed from each country,
yet we have two parties from Spain. From a historical perspective this
is an understandable decision, so it raises the need to address this in
the Constitution as the decision itself is unconstitutional.</span></div><div><br></div><div><span>The above examples show a disregard for the </span><span>statutes</span><span> and decision making processes agreed upon at the first GA. It is perfectly fine to radically change the </span><span>statutes</span><span>
if the current model is not working, it is not fine to ignore it when
its inconvenient. This sort of disregard of due process is the sort of
thing that enables corruption to flourish.</span></div><div><br></div><div><span>The
issues that remote delegates experienced at the last General Assembly
were hard to stomach because it was largely a re-run of the problems of
the year before. Remote delegates were ignored, much of the meeting got
bogged down in process and important resolutions were tabled for a whole
year so celebrity speakers could address the meeting. The organisation
is not yet fully formed and getting through motions with ample
participation and debate should be the first and overriding priority.
Everything else is just dressing which can come later.</span></div><div><br></div><div><span>Addressing
these issues is not a matter of holding a PPI congress outside of
Europe, but actually facilitating better participation by remote
delegates. Personally</span><span>,</span><span>
I think the motivation for the GA to be held outside of Europe was to
make Europeans take remote participation seriously by creating a much
greater need for it to function. The cost of sending delegates from
Australia would run into the multiple thousands of dollars and is not
economically feasible,</span><span> with</span><span> this money be</span><span>ing</span><span> much better spent on campaigns. This is not a cost we </span><span><i>must</i></span><span> incur</span><span>;</span><span> remote participation has a negligible cost and will help out every single Party unable to attend.</span></div>
<div><br></div><div><span>PPAU
holds our annual congresses with a large amount of participation
online. Being roughly the size of the EU but much more sparsely
populated, we had to get online participation right immediately or we
risked disenfranchising pretty much everyone not from Sydney or the
surrounding areas. Consequently</span><span>,</span><span>
we'd like to offer the following advice for facilitating better
participation in the next PPI GA based on our success at facilitating
online participation.</span></div><div><br></div><div><span>The
single most important thing is to integrate online participation into
the GA. Assigning one person to monitor IRC is not adequate. Every
single delegate attending, where they are technically able, should log
into IRC and all participate, monitor and share the discussion raised by
the remote delegates to the real-world meeting.</span></div><div><br></div><div><span>On
the technical side it is just a matter of maintaining the streams,
which need to be easily accessible by people with a low technical
proficiency.</span><span> For example our congress utili</span><span>s</span><span>es a cheap & simple audio/video stream combined with web based IRC client in one simple web portal.</span><span> If possible</span><span>,</span><span>
a projector showing the discussion on a screen for all to see would
also work well. If there is an issue with people who are not members
participating in votes, a password protected link for a specific
official channel can be sent to delegates before the GA. Time should be
left at the end of each item for lag, people still typing etc. You can
get a sense of the amount of lag by the delay in the online comments and
wait accordingly.</span></div><div><br></div><div><span>We expect better of Pirate Part</span><span>ies</span><span>
International. An umbrella organisation for the world's Pirate Parties
needs to embody Pirate principles. We expect the organisation to be
participatory, not exclusi</span><span>onary</span><span>. We expect democracy, transparency and accountability, all of which seem to be currently lacking.</span></div><div><br>
</div><div><span>If this year's GA is not serious about fixing the above problems, </span><span>the</span><span> National Council </span><span>of PPAU </span><span>will have no choice but to propose withdrawing from the organisation </span><span>at </span><span>our next National Congress.</span></div>
<div><br></div><div><span>Regards<br><br></span></div><div><span>Simon Frew<br><br></span></div><div><span>On behalf of Pirate Party Australia<br></span></div></div>