<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt;
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>My point is that thoughtless oversimplification of any given situation AFTER the facts to suit those that can only think simply, or always gather an absolute majority thinking simply because there are less people capable of handling complex situations...<br><br>Will get us into a black hole without democratic exit, called an IDIOCRACY.<br><br><br>I'm already ROFLMAO ;).<br><br><br>Antonio.<br><br><br><div>> From: loic.grobol@gmail.com<br>> Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 14:57:32 +0200<br>> To: pp.international.general@lists.pirateweb.net<br>> Subject: Re: [pp.int.general] Minutes of PPI GA 2013<br>> <br>> On 12 June 2013 14:51, Antonio Garcia <ningunotro@hotmail.com> wrote:<br>> > How conveniently formulated to be populistic and draw adhesion to your ad<br>> > hominem argument :( .<br>> ><br>> > "Voting on them", as already said, refers to the whole election procedure as<br>> > one single activity to participate in. The count of all the member parties<br>> > participating at that single place and moment as had been conveniently<br>> > announced to all that the election would take place (a for too many far and<br>> > inaccessible Kazan, with a shitty last-minute effort to save it from<br>> > disaster by the unannounced and ad-hoc organising of a very improvised<br>> > remote hub in Brussels where finally more than half of all delegates shared<br>> > a still to be improvised and untested remote connection that failed<br>> > miserably to provide the minimum comfort necessary) is 16, as evidenced<br>> > counting the columns in the published minutes.<br>> ><br>> > Thus, the votes needed to obtain +50% approval, standard votes or however<br>> > anyone wants to name them is... not less than 9.<br>> > Antonio.<br>> <br>> What I fail to see from all I have read so far is why you think there<br>> was a threshold of 50% approval. It is written 'simple majority',<br>> which means 'more YES than NO'. If there were a 50% threshold it would<br>> be 'absolute majority'. So what is actually your point?<br>> <br>> LG<br>> <br>> --<br>> Loïc Grobol.<br>> ____________________________________________________<br>> Pirate Parties International - General Talk<br>> pp.international.general@lists.pirateweb.net<br>> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general<br></div> </div></body>
</html>