<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt;
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>There IS a lot of wrong stacked around... http://samedokan.wordpress.com/2013/09/02/klarmachen-zum-kentern/ (english).<br><br>Years of consented wrongdoing.<br><br><br>Our mass dynamics, by mere condition of most of the participants, are steadily evolving towards IDIOCRAZY :(.<br><br>Liquid Feedback catalyzes the process...<br><br>... by allowing seeminly direct access to the stupid final mouse click, without making the intermediary enlightening process mandatory.<br><br>That is why superdelegates are such a mess... the more ignorant are faster and far more numerous choosing their champions.<br><br><br>The result... the actual total mess in the German Pirate Party.<br><br>Not to forget the idiocy in the Italian one...<br><br><br>Antonio.<br><br><br><div>> From: peppecal@gmail.com<br>> Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 14:28:09 +0200<br>> To: pp.international.general@lists.pirateweb.net<br>> Subject: Re: [pp.int.general] Liquid Democracy - a summary attempt<br>> <br>> On 28 April 2014 11:35, Zbigniew Łukasiak <zzbbyy@gmail.com> wrote:<br>> > I am sure that even once we have a good LF software - it will take<br>> > long time to work out the right social practice around it.<br>> <br>> I am worried this sounds a bit like the golden lqfb principle:<br>> <br>> "It's not the software. It's you. YOU are wrong."<br>> <br>> What a voting (or consensus building) platform aims to create is<br>> nothing less than an ecosystem. It need to impose constraints by the<br>> way it's built, not by the way you are expected to use it.<br>> ____________________________________________________<br>> Pirate Parties International - General Talk<br>> pp.international.general@lists.pirateweb.net<br>> http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general<br></div> </div></body>
</html>