<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Exchange Server">
<!-- converted from text --><style><!-- .EmailQuote { margin-left: 1pt; padding-left: 4pt; border-left: #800000 2px solid; } --></style>
</head>
<body>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<style type="text/css" style="">
<!--
p
{margin-top:0;
margin-bottom:0}
-->
</style>
<div dir="ltr">
<div id="x_divtagdefaultwrapper" style="font-size:12pt; color:#000000; background-color:#FFFFFF; font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">
<p>There is NOT one amendment that is not meant to DEREGULATE what little regulation there still was.</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>All needs to be improvised at the last minute... because nobody cares, but the crooky Germans from 2012, 2013... who are almost the only candidates for the BOARD ;(((.</p>
</div>
<hr tabindex="-1" style="display:inline-block; width:98%">
<div id="x_divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif" color="#000000" style="font-size:11pt"><b>De:</b> pp.international.general-bounces@lists.pirateweb.net <pp.international.general-bounces@lists.pirateweb.net> en nombre de carlo von lynX <lynX@pirate.my.buttharp.org><br>
<b>Enviado:</b> viernes, 22 de julio de 2016 14:43:14<br>
<b>Para:</b> pp.international.general@lists.pirateweb.net<br>
<b>Asunto:</b> [pp.int.general] GA: Statutes & Motions</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
</div>
<font size="2"><span style="font-size:10pt;">
<div class="PlainText"><a href="http://wiki.pp-international.net/PPI_Conference_2016/Statutes_Amendments">http://wiki.pp-international.net/PPI_Conference_2016/Statutes_Amendments</a><br>
<br>
SAP-1: What about actually proposing a rotation system?<br>
Simply abolishing stuff does not make a better democracy.<br>
<br>
SAP-2: How dare you not explain why you are proposing Geneva.<br>
<br>
SAP-3: Justice only exists during the General Assembly? In the<br>
period in-between the board can do whatever they like?<br>
Bad idea! If you want a better justice system you need<br>
to propose a better justice system, not abolish a<br>
cornerstone of democracy. It's like asking to abolish<br>
democracy because the current version is corruptible.<br>
<br>
SAP-6: How dare you not explain what the purpose of such<br>
non-voting appointed members would be?<br>
<br>
SAP-8: Indeed a bunch of representatives should not have<br>
policy-making power. We need a proper participation tool.<br>
<br>
SAP-9: Wording problem: The word "either" can legally be interpreted<br>
as meaning that if a member misses one GA they can be suspended<br>
from participating in the following one:<br>
<a href="http://english.stackexchange.com/questions/95559/can-either-mean-both-any-and-both">
http://english.stackexchange.com/questions/95559/can-either-mean-both-any-and-both</a><br>
<br>
SAP-10: An even better case of "Democracy is corruptible! Let's abolish<br>
democracy altogether!" If anyone cares to fix PPint statutes, sit<br>
down and write decent amendment proposals on how to do so. Don't<br>
delegate Erdogan-like powers to the board and hope that democracy<br>
will magically arise from there.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://wiki.pp-international.net/PPI_Conference_2016/Other_proposals">http://wiki.pp-international.net/PPI_Conference_2016/Other_proposals</a><br>
<br>
MO-1: Last minute motions are a classic means of assembly manipulation.<br>
I would rather suggest a different scheme, but it is too late<br>
to submit it now.<br>
<br>
MO-2: Yes, the mailing lists are a mess, but abolishing them is not a<br>
solution. Next time suggest to elect a moderator who is obligated<br>
to moderate all messages preemptively (like nettime-l or IPEN),<br>
and allow participants to complain to the CoA.<br>
<br>
MO-3: Obligatory sell-out of participant data to cloudflare.com is<br>
inacceptable. I would rather elect somebody to be in charge of<br>
setting up a voting/debate platform fulfilling requirements<br>
such as transparency and more. I would also make the possibility<br>
of transforming the tool into a platform for actual pirates<br>
rather than just representatives (to stop diluting democracy) a<br>
requirement.<br>
<br>
Most proposals suffer from lack of debate among pirates and thus<br>
of depth, competence and even transpaarency at times. We are <br>
definitely using the wrong methods to face these assemblies!<br>
<br>
<br>
-- <br>
E-mail is public! Talk to me in private using encryption:<br>
<a href="http://loupsycedyglgamf.onion/LynX/">http://loupsycedyglgamf.onion/LynX/</a><br>
irc://loupsycedyglgamf.onion:67/lynX<br>
<a href="https://psyced.org:34443/LynX/">https://psyced.org:34443/LynX/</a><br>
____________________________________________________<br>
Pirate Parties International - General Talk<br>
pp.international.general@lists.pirateweb.net<br>
<a href="http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general">http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.international.general</a><br>
</div>
</span></font>
</body>
</html>