Ngah?<div><br></div><div>Bör juh tilläggas också att den blockerade listan visats spärra sidor utan branpornografi vilket vidare ifrågasätter om de 50 000 träffarna ö.h.t. har med barnpornografi att göra.</div><div><br></div>
<div>Mvh,</div><div>John<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 7:07 PM, Amelia Andersdotter <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:teirdes@gmail.com">teirdes@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
ngaaaaaah<br>
<br>
<br>
---------- Forwarded message ----------<br>
From: Joe McNamee <<a href="mailto:joe@mcnamee.eu">joe@mcnamee.eu</a>><br>
Date: 27 March 2010 19:02<br>
Subject: FW: Your internet blocking article<br>
To: <a href="mailto:christian.engstroem@europarl.europa.eu">christian.engstroem@europarl.europa.eu</a>, <a href="mailto:teirdes@gmail.com">teirdes@gmail.com</a><br>
<br>
<br>
I’m sure you guys are better at communicating with Swedish media than I am L<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Joe<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
________________________________<br>
<br>
From: Joe McNamee [mailto:<a href="mailto:joe@mcnamee.eu">joe@mcnamee.eu</a>]<br>
Sent: 27 March 2010 16:08<br>
To: '<a href="mailto:tobias.olsson@svd.se">tobias.olsson@svd.se</a>'<br>
Subject: Your internet blocking article<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Dear Mr Olsson,<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
The statement made by Mr Lagerloef in your article that the 50,000<br>
figure (<a href="http://www.svd.se/nyheter/inrikes/malmstrom-vill-blockera-barnporrsajter_4479111.svd" target="_blank">http://www.svd.se/nyheter/inrikes/malmstrom-vill-blockera-barnporrsajter_4479111.svd</a>)<br>
is a ‘good indication’ is simply untrue. As well as the web bots and<br>
other automatic devices that cause the page to be downloaded, it<br>
should be obvious that a steady 50,000 per day every day of every week<br>
of every year for years either suggests an automated process – it is<br>
hardly the same 50,000 Swedes who do not spend five minutes learning<br>
about how to avoid the technically very limited blocking system.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
It is also worth noting that the Swedish figure is almost double, per<br>
capita, the Norwegian figure (15,000 per day). Is this due to the<br>
“fact” that there are twice as many paedophiles in Sweden or perhaps<br>
it is due to the statistics being entirely unreliable?<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
By the way, I find it strange that your article (based on the Google<br>
translation that I read) says that Commissioner Reding wrote a letter<br>
to Commissioner Malmstroem opposing the blocking proposal AND that all<br>
Commissioners supported it.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Finally, with regard to the “voluntary” system in Sweden, I draw your<br>
attention to the European Commission’s own “impact assessment” on this<br>
issue which states – “Such measures must indeed be subject to law, or<br>
they are illegal”. The Swedish system, being “voluntary” does not<br>
appear to be subject to law and, according to the Commission is<br>
therefore illegal.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
I would be happy to provide input on any further work you may do on this issue.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
With best regards,<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Joe McNamee<br>
<br>
European Digital Rights<br>
<br>
Rue Montoyer 39<br>
<br>
B-1000 Brussels<br>
<br>
Tel: +32 497 046114<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
--<br>
Amelia Andersdotter<br>
Lissabon-MEP<br>
+46 722063698<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
PP.Skane mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:PP.Skane@lists.pirateweb.net">PP.Skane@lists.pirateweb.net</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.skane" target="_blank">http://lists.pirateweb.net/mailman/listinfo/pp.skane</a><br>
</font></blockquote></div><br></div>