[pp.int.general] Fwd: stance on fairsharing / culture flatrate /levys
Jens Seipenbusch
seipenbusch at web.de
Wed Mar 28 20:13:56 CEST 2007
As i see it, we probably cannot compensate for the loss of worth of digitally copyable stuff in the long run.
Even a culture flatrate had the problem to set a price for something like a piece of music - and that without the selffinding possibilites of a free market (which will no longer exist after introduction of a flatrate)
and I dont like the thought that comes from the end product, like: We want 'Terminator 5' to be possible so someone must pay the 300 Millions for it - thats not my way of thinking it.
maybe we can (analog to the patent question, where the need will drive innovation instead of certainty for capital investment) just take the risk and try it out, and probably we'll find that still artists are paid by people who buy, even, when private sharing is big.
> But that raises the question of weather it is obsolete. There is still music and movies to be made. The question that we have to ask is if those who create it have a right to be payed like a baker has the right to be payed for his bread.
>
_______________________________________________________________
SMS schreiben mit WEB.DE FreeMail - einfach, schnell und
kostenguenstig. Jetzt gleich testen! http://f.web.de/?mc=021192
More information about the pp.international.general
mailing list